Skoči na vsebino

Wheelcheck


markop

Recommended Posts

  • Odgovori 76
  • Created
  • Zadnji odgovor

Top Posters In This Topic

Glede retultatov sem se obrnil na IR in tistega ki je napisal WheelCheck in FFB za IR nasploh. Bom kar copy/paste prilepil:

---------------------

Hi, I would need some help. I've asked the members of the local sim-racing community to perform the step2 test for their wheels. What I've got is somehow strange. The G27 wheels were pretty much in line, so were the T500. 

But, others were showing a zig-zag behaviour. Also the deltaX degrees was greater for the g27 wheel (red line) when compared to a T500. 

The OSW (black line) was totally off, even showing negative deltaX degrees. 

Can anybody explain where I'm doing it wrong ? 

---------------------

David Tucker:

The step test is really only good for comparing wheels that are very similar to each other. To get a proper view you want to switch over to physically measuring the wheel force, rather than the motors ability to overcome the wheel rims inertia and friction. Also from the post right above yours, you may want to set kd back to 0.25 to help smooth out the results. Finally you can't really get anything usefull out of an osw or accuforce wheel, there motors are so strong they accelerate to max velocity long before the test is complete, and often they end up slamming into the bump stops and bouncing back, etc. 

You can pick up a used USB postal scale for about $15 on ebay and with a bit of ingenuity you can turn that into a test rig for wheels. If you want to be super classy you can pick up a load cell and make your own strain guage for about $60. I can fill you in on the details of that if you are interested. 

http://members.iracing.com/jforum/posts/list/3482238.page

---------------------

Thanks David. 

Before turning to you/forums I've read a whole lot of this stuff here and in the wheel profiler forum. My goal was to have a relative comparison and not in the absolute torque measurement. Further, I wasn't interested in the comparison of the wheel base solely, but with the rim attached to it as this is what the user feels at the end. 

I'll subdivide what I don't understand (and asking for help) in three parts: 

1) Given all this it's my understanding is that the log2 test should be proportional to torque if you take the X position reading at the same time from feeding the input to the wheel. Indeed, all the G27 and T500 wheel looks nearly the same. Then there is that g27 (mare87_g27 red) graph that stands out in regards to other g27 wheels. 

2) Then, there are other wheels beside the OSW exhibiting that zig-zag behaviour for some unknown reason. Those are not DD wheels but for instance the Fanatec V2 base does the same - see the "alkoro CSPv2" graph. I doubt it hits the bumpstop in 300ms. I think it has more to do with the Fanatec DRI setting. 

3) For the OSW wheel I even tried to lower the "step time" to 25ms for the OSW, but the result wasn't the expected one either. 

Is my understanding of the log2 test fundamentally wrong ? Thanks. 

---------------------

David Tucker:

No you have it right, but you aren't seeing all the variables. In an ideal world, if there was no resistance on the drive train and the wheel rims all had a uniform weight, then the step2 test would always allow you to compare each wheel to the other directly. However different wheels have different weight rims (some with offset weights even) and they all have different levels of drag in the drive train. 

The belt driven wheels have a lot more drag than the gear drive or direct drive wheels. This can be a good or bad thing but it definitely changes the results. That is why you can see the G27 matching the T500 even though the T500 has 2x the torque. This is also why an older broken in G25 wheel will often beat out a new G29 wheel, the gear train has less drag the more it wears. 

I use a PID loop to center the wheels between samples in the step2 test, and without the kd value being set to 0.25 the wheel (apparently) is overshooting and oscillating instead of just returning to center. This is affecting the results, causing a wild oscillation on some wheels so be sure to run the test again with kd set to 0.25. That should make the Fanatec work better at least. 

OSW wheels are just way too strong to ever work with this test. They have large motors with little drag and they have intelligent controllers that limit there max acceleration and velocity. The net result is that after only a few milliseconds they are already spinning at there full speed rather than accelerating up to speed over time like all the other wheels. This has two effects, it messes with the numbers (of course) and it allows them to spin into there bumpstops causing them to bounce back off of them really hard. If you watch the wheel running the test it looks like a jack hammer that is flopping all over the place. You can tweak the settings to make it work (sort of) but the end result is still not worth much. Think of it like trying to use an RC airplane engine dyno on a corvette, the engine would be so powerful that the measurements are meaningless. If you really want to make the OSW work then slap a bunch of weight on the rim. I think 2-3 sand bags would do the trick. 

There is still something to be gained from running this test and comparing wheels, you do get an idea of how much resistance each wheel produces and that in turn gives you a feel for how responsive the wheels will be. As it turns out the belt drive wheels with there extra mechanical damping feel smoother (or sluggish depending on who you ask) while the gear driven wheels feel snappier (or more rattly)

Really a step response test should only last for 30 ms or so, but I'm pushing it up to 300 ms because our update rate from the wheels just is not fast enough. 300 ms is way too much time and lets the stronger wheels accelerate too much, but lowering the number just makes a mess of the response plot (as you found out). You can compromise and use 150 ms but that is not low enough to fix the problems so it does not seem useful to me. 

Also you really should be looking at the derivatives of the plot to work out velocity and acceleration but again we lack the ability to measure the wheels position with good precision so the derivatives are a real mess even with lots of filtering. 

In short this is the best you can do with what little we have, but it is not very good compared to using a load cell or some other setup.

Oh, and drift mode on the Fanatec wheels is a feedback loop so it will make the test more unstable. Your best bet is to turn it off when running these tests.

---------------------

 

Link to post
pred 8 minutami, markop je napisal:

Oh, and drift mode on the Fanatec wheels is a feedback loop so it will make the test more unstable. Your best bet is to turn it off when running these tests.

 

this! 

Link to post
  • 3 weeks later...

Sem videl,da ga prodaja in je videti super ohranjen (kot nov).

Moram ti povedati,da je obroč,ki sem ga kupil od tebe noro dober. Ko vozim v iRacingu Corvette Daytona Prototype z tem obročem je občutek in vodljivost čisto drugačna,kot pa recimo z F1 ali pa original GT volanskim obročem.

Link to post

Ja th obroč je zelo dober. Men je bil tudi všeč. Ta BMW-jev je pa malo večji pa dost težji :) ja pa super ohranjen je. Mal sva temo zasmetila :). Me veseli da ti je oborč dober in da ti služi še dolgo.

Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Odgovori na to temo...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Povezava je bila samodejno vdelana.   Raje prikaži samo povezavo

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Počisti urejevalnik

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Temo prebirajo   0 uporabnikov

    Te strani si ne ogleduje noben registriran uporabnik

×
×
  • Ustvari novo...